For years, people have debated whether squirting is actually real or if it’s just girls peeing on guys so that they can get their freak on while doing the deed. I say it doesn’t matter whether it’s pee or not, since if a girl squirts on you during sex, it's a surefire sign that you’re doing her right. But when we’re talking porn, squirting porn itself is still considered somewhat of a niche category. It might not be as out there as some other, more BDSM and fetish-centered categories tend to be, but it’s definitely not vanilla by any means. This is likely because squirting doesn’t occur all that often during sex, therefore, it remains just under the surface of the vanilla crust that makes up popular modern-day porn categories. But even if squirting itself doesn’t happen all too often in real-life sex, there are still a plethora of squirting-themed videos to be found online, as plenty of porntubes, both popular and obscure, host a ton of squirting-themed content, such as iWank here.
What sort of content can you expect here?
If you type “Squirt” into iWank, you’ll find exactly what you came and sought out to come for: content that shows guys screwing women while they’re leaking out bodily fluids from their private parts. Of course, there’s also a lot of action that involves setups that go beyond the typical man-on-woman composition; for example, you’ve got more than a few clips here that depict group sex, threesomes, solos, lesbians, BDSM, and fetish-centric stuff, outdoor voyeur content, and so on. The content here isn’t without its exclusives as well, as you’re sure to hit a few paywalls while clicking on the thumbnails.
However, iWank also hosts plenty of mid-quality clips with an amateur spirit to them, as well as more than enough freely watchable HD entries. That being said, this site comes with a twist; once you click a video thumbnail, you’re redirected to another domain where the video itself is hosted. This is because iWank is a porntube aggregator, meaning that all it does is simply host videos from other porntubes, and doesn’t actually have any content on its own domain. Now this might not sound like good news to a lot of people, but the positive side of it is the sheer breadth of iWank’s redirects, which can sometimes lead you to rare scenes that you otherwise wouldn’t have found on actual standalone porntubes.
What about when it comes to the production quality of IWank’s squirt-themed content
The backbone here is amateur content. Self-filmed, handheld, and imperfect are just a few words I can use to describe iWank’s mostly amateur-based catalog of squirting videos. You’ll spot shaky cams, occasional background noise, weird shadows, and lackluster lighting that’s far from its glossy, gleaming studio-made counterpart. Now, this amateur-made stuff only makes up about half of or so of all the entries here, as there are also more than a few clips on this site’s squirt category that look like they’ve had some thought put into them before they were filmed. These clips certainly have that studio-level shine to them, which includes adequate use of angles, clean lighting and audio, and other factors that separate them from the mostly amateur chaff that makes up at least half of all this site’s squirting-themed videos. All that being said, iWank’s squirting category has more than enough content for fans of both amateur and studio-quality porn.
Every single thumbnail here sends you somewhere else
iWank operates kind of like how the Omenpaths work in Magic: The Gathering, or how the whole multiverse operates in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. And even though the two aforementioned examples are merely a means for those two franchises to go over-the-top with their worldbuilding so that they can intertwine as many plotlines and characters as possible all as a means of being able to overproduce as much content as they physically can, the same can’t be said for iWank here, as the whole point of this site is to link you to as many porntubes as possible, and that’s about it. This means that you’ll discover basically every kind of squirting-themed XXX clip imaginable in its catalog, except for the kinds of squirting clips that simply can’t be shown on porntube aggregates. Again, iWank isn’t really a standalone porntube with its own hosted content, and is more like a curated doorway of content that leads you to a plethora of other standalone porntubes.
Now, one fundamental flaw that I’ve realized is all too common with these kinds of porntube aggregates is that they don’t host a lot of independent creator-made content, if any. Independent creators typically make deals with porntubes that agree to showcase their content for a certain sum of money. Porntube aggregators, like iWank here on the other hand, aren’t actual porntubes, so rarely are they in a position to strike such a deal with independent creators, if ever. And we all know that independent-made porn is all the rage nowadays, as it typically rivals studio-made porn in terms of quality when it isn’t objectively better. With that in mind, don’t expect to run into any independent creator-made content here on iWank’s squirting section, if any. But on the flipside, you have a better chance to run into rare and obscure, oftentimes raw amateur content that simply isn’t present or given an algorithm push on traditional standalone porntubes.
The filters here are limited but functional
iWank here doesn’t overdo it with its filtering options. For sorting, you get “Popular” vs “Latest,” and for content length, there’s “All” or “Long.” That’s about it. No tag filters, no resolution filters, or anything else. If you want the best stuff, which is determined by public opinion, then your best bet is to rely on the “Popular” filter. If you want to see the newest squiring clips here, then you’ll want to click on the “Latest” filter. And lastly, the “Long” option is decent when you want a full session rather than a short burst. The options are limited, but they’re good enough to give you some autonomy when sifting through content.
Smartphone experience: lean, mean & mostly bearable
Because iWank is stripped down and barebones, it tends to fare okay on mobile. The minimalist style on this site’s presentation works in its favor: fewer ads, fewer heavy scripts, less lag, and whatnot. Videos play quickly, thumbnails load and animate, and navigation isn’t horrendously broken - so long as you haven’t clicked on a thumbnail that is. The redirection factor here is certainly jarring when accessing this site via smartphone, as you have no idea what kind of site you’ll land on: Will it be a well-optimized experience for smartphones, or will it be a disheveled mess? There are just way too many sites that iWank here redirects to in order to know that for sure.
